After having to write and illustrate my own children’s book for my last project I have decided to write this part on comparing four children’s books. The books I have chosen to talk about are:
‘NO!’ by Marta Altes
‘Jack Frost’ by Kazuno Kohara
‘Where the Wild Things Are’ by Maurice Sendak
‘Grow Your Own’ by Esther Hall
(sorry the covers have been cut off slightly, my scanner wasn't big enough for the books.)
‘NO!’ by Marta Altes
I love everything about this book, from the colour scheme, the text, the layouts and illustrations. I picked this book because of all those reasons and because the story is written so well and it is a comical book. The story and illustrations appeal to both adults and children, which in my opinion make it a brilliant children’s book. I love her use of space in the compositions across the double pages. She creates a real feel of movement throughout and the character is consistent. The illustrations do all the talking in this book but the typography and the story all work so well together and give the book something different to all others. I think the book works so well because people can also relate to it, especially if they are dog owners. The illustrations have a real hand made feel to them with hand type and the fingerprint marks for the mud. Very simple and very effective. Out of all the books I have chosen this one is my favourite when it comes to typography, the text is very hand finished and consistent throughout from the cover to the last page. I liked the way that bits are crossed out or underlined, as if the character himself has written it. This is something that differs in the other books. The placement of the text also works well with the theme of the rest of the book; it isn’t placed in the same position on every page.
‘Jack Frost’ by Kazuno Kohara
I think I was drawn to Kazuno’s work due to her use of printmaking. She sticks to using one colour throughout all her books which works very well, especially considering it was all hand printed. In similarity to ‘NO!’ her layouts work really well especially the way she uses double pages. I love the way she leaves some of the print lines that should have been cut away, this gives it a hand made feel just as Marta has achieved in her book. In all the books I have chosen they have all kept the character very consistent and changed the scales of them throughout the stories. The type in this book works well with the illustrations and the thickness of the lines. I think the way she has moved the text around the pages work well also, it isn’t in the same place on every page. I really like that the only colour is in the background instead of the foreground and characters as it is in all the other books and in fact most children’s books. The story is really playful and heart warming as it goes through the story of ‘the boy’ and ‘Jack Frost’ playing in the snow.
‘Where the Wild Things Are’ by Maurice Sendak
Just like the other books I really like his use of space in his layouts. At the start of the book there is just a square of illustration on the right and a line of text on the left, as you go through the book the illustrations start to take over the entire double pages gradually. This works as it goes with the story, as ‘Max’s’ imagination gets into the story the pages start to fill. Again like all the others the colour scheme is really nice and works very well. And in this like ‘Jack Frost’ and ‘NO!’ there is a real sense of movement. One thing I think could have been improved in this book is a bit more a variation in size of the character; they stay a very similar size throughout unlike in the others. ‘NO!’ and ‘Where the Wild Things Are’ both have a real feel and subtlety with shadows. This book uses cross-hatching to create its shadows and feel of movement. It seems like there were a few different mediums and methods used to create the illustrations, watercolour paints, pen and coloured pencils seem to be the main source. One thing I like about this book, which wasn’t done in any of the others, is that he has done pages, which are solely illustrated and have no text; these pages didn’t necessarily need any text, as the pictures are simple and self-explanatory.
‘Grow Your Own’ by Esther Hall
The last book I chose to write about was ‘Grow Your Own’, I was immediately drawn to this one for the same reasons I was to ‘Jack Frost’. I am a very interested in printmaking, especially lino prints. This book is beautifully illustrated and is very similarly illustrated as ‘Jack Frost’. They both do have many differences but I love how they have both used their prints. Unlike ‘Jack Frost’ this book is done in full colour, and has used many different colours to create the backgrounds and foregrounds. This book unlike the others doesn’t particularly have a colour scheme, although the colours she has used compliment each other, the story and work well as a whole. This book too has a real hand made quality just as the others, especially ‘NO!’ and ‘Jack Frost’. Some of the parts of the illustrations look like they have been mono printed (like the background, sky/grass), this is another part of print I am really interested in and practice myself. One thing I think this book could have had which was used in ‘Jack frost’ was the uncut parts which were left over on some of its pages, it gave it more of a rustic feel which I would have liked to see here, however I cannot fault this books illustrations.
After looking at all of these books together I have found many similarities but also quite a few differences. Such as colour, ‘Jack Frost’ had a very simple but definite colour scheme as it only used the one colour (two shades) and black and white. ‘NO!’ had a more varied scheme, the same colours cropped up throughout and the tones were very similar. ‘Where the Wild Things Are’ was quite similar to ‘NO!’ in the way it used colour as there were more colours in ‘Where the Wild Things Are’ but the tones of the colours stayed the same throughout as in ‘NO!’.
The obvious similarities lay in the methods of producing the illustrations. The most obvious being between ‘Jack Frost’ and ‘Grow Your Own’ as they both used printing techniques to create their illustrations. Both used very minimal and simple styles however ‘Grow Your Own’ was a lot more complex in the sense of colour usage and shadows. Whereas ‘Jack Frost’ used very simple lines, the stories and illustration matched beautifully for them both. If ‘Grow Your Own’ were done in the way as ‘Jack Frost’ it wouldn’t have worked. The colour and shade was in my opinion needed as the book was about growing vegetables, which wouldn’t look right done differently. The same the other way round, colours weren’t needed in ‘Jack Frost’ because of the snow and the story.
‘Where the Wild Things Are’ and ‘NO!’ have similarities in their colour schemes and use of tones. As well as their use of shadows and medium. They both used watercolour paint, pencil and pen. The text was the main thing that differed between the two ‘NO!’ is very hand made unlike all the others. The text placement was also very different and more experimental in ‘NO!’, which again suits the book and story well.
Word Count: 1309